![]() That alone makes this irredeemably bad in my opinion and if they can't find a way to eliminate that them they should consider telemetry to be an infeasible feature. Well I care that they are trying to claim 12 year olds can't use free software. More will as they are introduced to Tenacity. While they cannot simply delete Audacity - well, they are technically entitled to retract their contributions, but Muse cynically said they'd replaced it all.with identical code - they can capitalize on Muse's inability to message effectively to do the next best thing and bury the project. This is all moot, of course, as the developers who were driving Audacity's development have all moved to the fork called Tenacity it turns out that the Audacity of Hope is Tenacity (thanks, Obama!). That implies there's something else they aren't being honest with everyone about. That just makes me even more uncomfortable with dismissing their intentions as "not spyware." Certainly, evading COPPA restrictions requires some weird gymnastics, but it doesn't seem to require the level of gymnastics that Muse is engaged in. In this particular scenario, you have an entity that has lied to contributors and the general public at several points about several portions of these events. In the latter conditional you have too many variables to consider to make it a clear-cut statement. ![]() ![]() I would not feel comfortable allowing that opt-out telemetry collection isn't spyware. I would largely agree opt-in telemetry collection isn't spyware. Jim, much respect for defending your position.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |